Tips & Tutorials

Learn How Android Antivirus Apps Are Tested

If you’re going to use antivirus software, it’s common sense to make sure that it works and that it’s the best possible option. Luckily, the Internet is full of sites that compare and contrast different antivirus systems. Many of them assign scores to individual programs, which makes finding the top one easy. But what isn’t always apparent is exactly how they’ve come up with the scores.

Testing apps is just like any scientific experiment, and like an experiment, you want to make sure there is only one variable (in this case, the app itself). In order to ensure this, testers need to ensure that the phones they are using to test the product all run the same way, that they have an equal amount of processing power, free memory, etc. After setting the constants, the testers download the apps, and the real testing begins.

Learn More: The Most Common Viruses of 2017 and How to Stop Them

How Successful Is the Antivirus Program?
Generally, the folks running the experiments are looking for two things. The first is obvious: Can this app successfully detect and prevent malware? This is tested by targeting the phone with numerous types of popular malware. It’s important to offer both quantity and variety. A score of 100 out of 100 is obviously better than 10 out of 10. Testers want to ensure the app is able to catch different types of malware, so nothing slips through the cracks. It’s also important to run normal programs in this stage, to see how accurate an app is. Sometimes apps will recognize a perfectly normal app, web page, or file as malware when in truth it’s totally safe, and this can affect the app’s score.

How Does the Antivirus Program Function?
The second important thing to test for is how well the app runs alongside other apps. Antivirus apps have to run alongside a lot of other apps, constantly ensuring the apps aren’t somehow letting malware in the backdoor. But you don’t want the antivirus app to slow down the other apps. It’s great if your Internet is safe, but if keeping your Internet safe means it’ll take an hour to load a web page, it’s hardly worth it.

Finally, there is going to be some subjectivity. Different apps may offer features that others do not, and it’s impossible to perfectly score each app on the same things. Some people may prefer added features at the cost of usability, and some might not. Some may prefer user-friendly interfaces, and some may prefer higher levels of security, even if it grants them less control. At the end of the day, it’s best to do as much research as you can into how testers tested the apps they’re recommending.

PSafe Newsroom

The dfndr blog is an informative channel that presents exclusive content on security and privacy in the mobile and business world, with tips to keep users protected. Populated by a select group of expert reporters, the channel has a partnership with dfndr lab's security team. Together they bring you, first-notice news about attacks, scams, internet vulnerabilities, malware and everything affecting cybersecurity.

Recent Posts

24 Billion Passwords Exposed? How to Check If You’re Affected.

A massive password leak has triggered a global security alert: Cybernews researchers identified an exposed…

57 years ago

That QR Code on Your Bar Table During the Game: Would You Scan It Without Thinking?

A QR code on a bar table could hide a phishing link. Learn how to…

57 years ago

Could You Spot a Fake Login Page in 5 Seconds? Take the Phishing Test

Before you keep reading, imagine this: You receive a message warning that your account is…

57 years ago

Is Mobile Data Always Safer Than Public Wi-Fi? Myth or Fact?

You’re at an airport and need to open your banking app. Which would you choose:…

57 years ago

Jury Duty Scam: Fake Arrest Warrants Are Targeting Americans

What would you do if someone claiming to be a U.S. Marshal called and said…

57 years ago

World Cup 2026 Streams: How to Tell Safe Links from Dangerous Ones

Kickoff is minutes away. You search for a 2026 World Cup stream and receive a…

57 years ago